a5c7b9f00b A rare mutation has occurred within the vampire community. The Reaper. A vampire so consumed with an insatiable bloodlust that they prey on vampireswellhumans, transforming victims who are unlucky enough to survive into Reapers themselves. Now their quickly expanding population threatens the existence of vampires, and soon there won't be enough humans in the world to satisfy their bloodlust. Blade, Whistler (Yes, he's back) and an armory expert named Scud are curiously summoned by the Shadow Council. The council reluctantly admits that they are in a dire situation and they require Blade's assistance. Blade then tenuously enters into an alliance with The Bloodpack, an elite team of vampires trained in all modes of combat to defeat the Reaper threat. Blade's team and the Bloodpack are the only line of defense which can prevent the Reaper population from wiping out the vampire and human populations.
Blade forms an uneasy alliance with the vampire council in order to combat the Reapers, who are feeding on vampires.
Blade had a lot of wonderful action sequences. The special effects and the creature effects were pretty spectacular except for in a couple of scenes. However, this is where the movie ends. There's no real story line (very cliche) and the acting in this movie is an exception rather than the norm. You have no reason to empathize with Blade or the characters in the movie. You don't get to look into the psyche of the main characteryou did with the original Blade. Stephen Norrington (director of the Original Blade) painted a picture of a scarred and tragic hero battling the forces of evil in order to heal the ache in his soul for how life wronged him. Blade II throws that out of the water and is a cheap thrill ride of non-stop action and horrific effects. While I found the action and creatures of the movie particularly pleasing with its graphic nature, I felt the sequel lost some of its maturity from the first film and is a disservice to the franchise. I appreciate it when directors treat comic book heroesif they are real, with respect, and drama interlaced with action. I think this is one of the elements that made X-Men so successful. But I also think it's an element that made Unbreakable and the Original Blade notsuccessfulthey could of been. In this case, the film makers erred on the side of making money. So if you're coming to see a movie with great non-stop action and horror then you've come to the right movie. But if you're looking for an intelligent script that pulls you into the world of the lead character, stick with the Original Blade.
This film was a profound disipointment!<br/><br/>After being forced to see the first film, and liking it, i was looking fowart to this one……what a MISTAKE. <br/><br/>It could be that all the hipe added to my, quite high, expitations but after seeing it i felt cheated and conned into seeing a cash cow of a movie. The story was bad (Blade with the vampires!!!!) acting was below par and it was all special Fx. <br/><br/>If it was a first of the secres they would NOT have make a second or even a third. Don't see this film unless you you a fanatic. <br/><br/>3 out of 10
The drawing card for Blade II is – the promise of a blood-soaked action/horror thrill ride, and Snipes and Del Toro get the down-and-dirty job done with style.
Blade IIis based on a vampire hunter featured in Marvel Comics. He was created by Marv Wolfman and Gene Colan. Blade's first appearance was in The Tomb of Dracula #10 (July 1973)a supporting character. The comic book Blade was adapted for the movie by American screenwriter David Goyer. The first Blade movie, <a href="/title/tt0120611/">Blade (1998)</a>, was released in 1998, followed by Blade II. A third sequel, <a href="/title/tt0359013/">Blade: Trinity (2004)</a> followed in 2004. While it's never explicitly stated, Blade is seen with a large supply of Serum, in much smaller bottles from the first film. The amount of these he has suggests he does not need to increase his dose - Chances are, once she developed this, Karen left - either to return to a normal life or to join another group. There are a number of theories: (1) A line of dialogue from the film explains, "He shot himself and then he turned",says Rush, the vampire Blade allows to leavea "loose end" for showing him Whistler; (2) Director Guillermo Del Toro argued that no one saw Whistler shoot himself (in the DVD commentary), so he really didn't die in Del Toro's eyes; and (3) A deleted scene from the original Blade. When Blade and Karen were climbing out into the daylight after Blade had just blown up Deacon Frost, there was a figure in the background that appeared to be Whistler. It was hinting at him returning in a sequel, but the filmmakers decided to leave it out of the film. (Probably because they didn't know if a sequel was to happen yet.)
Curse of the Mayans full movie in hindi free downloadNaked Shadows movie download hdEpisode 1.14 full movie in hindi 720p downloadUniversal Soldier telugu full movie downloaddownload full movie The 2400 in hindiBeyond Skyline in hindi download free in torrentOutlaws Don't Get Funerals full movie in hindi 720p downloadEpisode 1.135 telugu full movie downloadGargoyles: The Goliath Chronicles movie in hindi free downloadthe Border Phantom hindi dubbed free download